Waveguide & illumination
–
nm
nm
nm
Grating layout
°
°
°
Target FOV & plate geometry
°
°
mm
mm
mm
Summary
Grating prescription (at design λ)
Per-colour propagation & pupil replication
What this means
Normalized k-space diagram (kx/k₀, ky/k₀)
Max diagonal FOV vs substrate index
Waveguide cross-section — TIR bounces & pupil replication
Method: the guided-mode "two-circle" diagram after Levola (J. Soc. Inf. Display
14, 467, 2006) and Kress (Proc. SPIE 11062, 2019): a field is guided iff 1 < ρ ≤ n with
ρ = |kt|/k₀ = n·sin θ, and each diffraction translates the field footprint by λ/Λ along its grating
vector. Fields map to k-space by direction cosines (kx,ky)/k₀ = (tan θx, tan θy)/√(1+tan²θx+tan²θy),
so the binding constraint is the diagonal corner field, not sin(H/2)/sin(V/2). Grating vectors satisfy the
Levola closure ΣK = 0 (zero net dispersion → achromatic virtual image); the fold period follows
Λfold = Λin/(2·sin(turn/2)). Max-FOV limits use the annulus width
(mono: 2·asin((n·sinθmax−n·sinθmin)/2)) and the single-set colour bound
2·asin((n·λB−λR)/(λB+λR)); bounces use plane-parallel geometry
s = 2·t·tan θ, Np = Lout/s + 1. This is the first-order layout step only: it fixes
periods, orientations, FOV feasibility and plate count, and assumes ideal thin gratings, single order m = 1 and a
wavelength-flat band. The max-FOV numbers are the conservative radial-annulus-width bounds; real
2D-expansion architectures (dual-channel, butterfly) beat them by routing horizontal and vertical fields
azimuthally around the full annulus, at the cost of layout complexity — so treat those ceilings as the
single-channel limit, not a hard wall. Diffraction efficiency, uniformity, ghost/rainbow orders and eyebox
luminance need a rigorous coupled-wave (RCWA) solve in VirtualLab Fusion, RSoft or Lumerical — seed them with the
prescription here.
Why does a wider field of view demand a higher-index substrate?
All the fields you want to display have to live inside the TIR "annulus" — the ring
between the air circle (ρ = 1) and the substrate circle (ρ = n) — because only there is the light trapped by
total internal reflection yet still able to reach the eye. The annulus is only (n − 1)-ish wide, and the FOV
footprint has to fit across it, so the monochrome grazing limit is 2·asin((n−1)/2): about 29° at n = 1.5, 41° at
1.7, 60° at 2.0. Full colour is worse, because red and blue land at different radii for one grating set. That
single geometric fact is why glass waveguides stack multiple plates for RGB and why Meta reached for silicon
carbide (n ≈ 2.6) to get a 70°-class single plate.