MyntOptics Engineering Tools
Tools / AR/VR displays

AR Waveguide k-space Designer

First-order layout of a diffractive exit-pupil-expander combiner, drawn where every waveguide team actually designs it — normalized k-space. Places the in-coupler, fold/EPE and out-coupler gratings on the Levola two-circle diagram with the closed-loop ΣK = 0 achromatic condition, then answers the go/no-go questions: max field of view for this index, which colour clips the TIR annulus first, single- vs multi-plate, grating prescriptions, TIR bounce spacing and pupil replication across the eyebox.

Waveguide & illumination

–
nm
nm
nm

Grating layout

°
°
°

Target FOV & plate geometry

°
°
mm
mm
mm

Summary

Grating prescription (at design λ)

Per-colour propagation & pupil replication

What this means

Normalized k-space diagram (kx/k₀, ky/k₀)

Max diagonal FOV vs substrate index

Waveguide cross-section — TIR bounces & pupil replication

Method: the guided-mode "two-circle" diagram after Levola (J. Soc. Inf. Display 14, 467, 2006) and Kress (Proc. SPIE 11062, 2019): a field is guided iff 1 < ρ ≤ n with ρ = |kt|/k₀ = n·sin θ, and each diffraction translates the field footprint by λ/Λ along its grating vector. Fields map to k-space by direction cosines (kx,ky)/k₀ = (tan θx, tan θy)/√(1+tan²θx+tan²θy), so the binding constraint is the diagonal corner field, not sin(H/2)/sin(V/2). Grating vectors satisfy the Levola closure ΣK = 0 (zero net dispersion → achromatic virtual image); the fold period follows Λfold = Λin/(2·sin(turn/2)). Max-FOV limits use the annulus width (mono: 2·asin((n·sinθmax−n·sinθmin)/2)) and the single-set colour bound 2·asin((n·λB−λR)/(λB+λR)); bounces use plane-parallel geometry s = 2·t·tan θ, Np = Lout/s + 1. This is the first-order layout step only: it fixes periods, orientations, FOV feasibility and plate count, and assumes ideal thin gratings, single order m = 1 and a wavelength-flat band. The max-FOV numbers are the conservative radial-annulus-width bounds; real 2D-expansion architectures (dual-channel, butterfly) beat them by routing horizontal and vertical fields azimuthally around the full annulus, at the cost of layout complexity — so treat those ceilings as the single-channel limit, not a hard wall. Diffraction efficiency, uniformity, ghost/rainbow orders and eyebox luminance need a rigorous coupled-wave (RCWA) solve in VirtualLab Fusion, RSoft or Lumerical — seed them with the prescription here.
Why does a wider field of view demand a higher-index substrate?
All the fields you want to display have to live inside the TIR "annulus" — the ring between the air circle (ρ = 1) and the substrate circle (ρ = n) — because only there is the light trapped by total internal reflection yet still able to reach the eye. The annulus is only (n − 1)-ish wide, and the FOV footprint has to fit across it, so the monochrome grazing limit is 2·asin((n−1)/2): about 29° at n = 1.5, 41° at 1.7, 60° at 2.0. Full colour is worse, because red and blue land at different radii for one grating set. That single geometric fact is why glass waveguides stack multiple plates for RGB and why Meta reached for silicon carbide (n ≈ 2.6) to get a 70°-class single plate.